Visit the Archive

Bookmark this page on your mobile

QR Code image

What is this?

Toledo Legal News - News Drug dealer who said lawyer 'tricked' him into plea deal has appeal denied

 

A three-judge panel recently affirmed a Scioto County Court of Common Pleas decision denying a man’s post-sentence motion to withdraw a guilty plea in his drug trafficking case.

The 4th District Court of Appeals ruled that Anthony Owens could have raised his argument and filed his request to withdraw his guilty plea in a direct appeal.

However, because he failed to do so until eight months after he entered the plea, the court held that his actions were not timely.

“Because we conclude that the arguments raised under Owens’ sole assignment of error are barred by the doctrine of res judicata, we overrule the assignment of error,” Presiding Judge Marie Hoover wrote for the court.

The facts of the case state that Owens was indicted in March 2013 on counts of trafficking in drugs, possession of drugs and tampering with evidence.

He pleaded not guilty to all charges and filed a demand for discovery, a request for a bill of particulars and a motion to preserve evidence.

The state provided those items in April 2013 and also provided supplemental discovery in June 2013.

One month later, Owens’ attorney filed a motion to withdraw as counsel.

In that motion, the attorney asserted that Owens was not cooperating or communicating.

Further, it was alleged that Owens failed to appear for an appointment to discuss his defense and that counsel had not heard from him in nearly a month.

The common pleas court did not rule upon the motion to withdraw and instead scheduled a jury trial to begin in early August 2013.

Owens failed to appear on the set date and a bench warrant was issued for his arrest.

In September 2013, Owens entered into a plea deal with the state in which he pleaded guilty to one count of trafficking in oxycodone.

The trial court sentenced him to seven years in prison on that offense and he did not file a direct appeal to challenge either his conviction or his sentence.

However, in May 2014, Owens made a motion to withdraw his guilty plea on the grounds that his counsel was ineffective.

He asserted that his trial counsel should have moved to suppress evidence against him, which he argued was seized in violation of his Fourth Amendment rights.

The trial court denied that motion without a hearing and he appealed to the 4th District.

Again, he argued that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to file a motion to suppress and for “tricking” him into taking the plea deal.

“Crim.R. 32.1 provides that ‘a motion to withdraw a plea of guilty or no contest may be made only before sentence is imposed; but to correct manifest injustice the court after sentence may set aside the judgment of conviction and permit the defendant to withdraw his or her plea,’” Hoover wrote.

Based on that statute, the judges held that Owens had the burden of establishing the existence of a manifest injustice, defined as a “clear and openly unjust act.”

In his argument before the appellate panel, Owens contended he should be granted his motion to withdraw his guilty plea because his counsel proved ineffective by failing to file a motion to suppress the evidence against him.

“Such an alleged impropriety is not properly before us,” Hoover stated in response.

The judges noted they have consistently ruled that the doctrine of res judicata bars a defendant from raising any argument after sentencing that could have been raised in a direct appeal.

In Owens’ case, they determined that he was aware of his counsel’s actions or inaction at the time they occurred and he could have raised his argument at sentencing or in a direct appeal. His failure to do so rendered his post-sentence motion untimely.

“Thus, under the doctrine of res judicata, Owens cannot raise the issue now, when he could have raised it in a first appeal of right,” Hoover wrote.

“For the foregoing reasons we overrule Owens’ assignment of error and affirm the trial court’s judgment.”

Judge William Harsha and Administrative Judge Matthew McFarland joined Hoover to form the majority.

The case is cited State v. Owens, 2015-Ohio-1509.

JESSICA SHAMBAUGH, Daily Reporter Staff Writer

Proposal would reduce beekeepers' liability against damage claims

Noting bees' importance as pollinators of the fresh produce items Ohioans eat and the other crops raised throughout the Buckeye State, a lawmaker has proposed a bill that would relieve responsible beekeepers of liability against personal injury or property damage claims.

Date Published: November 17, 2017

Substitute custodian not regular school employee

A substitute custodian whose schedule is irregular with respect to days of service, hours worked, and school-building assignment is not considered a “regular nonteaching school employee” under an Ohio law that would qualify him for better wages and benefits, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled.

Date Published: November 17, 2017

UT’s Logan Woodside named Heisman contender by Heisman Trophy Trust

Senior quarterback Logan Woodside (Frankfort, KY) has been notified by the Heisman Trophy Trust that he is a "contender" for the 2017 Heisman Trophy and a candidate to be one of the finalists for the prestigious award given annually the best football player in the country.

Date Published: November 17, 2017

Bill that seeks to bolster free speech at public universities advances

Just days after the Ohio State University declined allowing white nationalist and provocateur Richard Spencer to book a speaking engagement on campus, a pair of Republican lawmakers in the Ohio House of Representatives offered testimony in support of their Campus Free Speech Act.

Date Published: November 16, 2017

Statewide investments to create more than $131 million in new payroll

Governor John R. Kasich recently announced the approval of assistance for 10 projects set to create 2,828 new jobs and retain 10,291 jobs statewide. During its monthly meeting, the Ohio Tax Credit Authority (TCA) reviewed economic development proposals brought to the board by JobsOhio and its regional partners. Collectively, the projects are expected to result in more than $131 million in new payroll, and spur more than $122 million in investments across Ohio.

Date Published: November 16, 2017

UT women’s swimming & diving splits home tri-meet

The Toledo women's swimming and diving team hosted its first home meet of the season Saturday November 4, splitting a tri-meet with Ball State and Oakland. The Rockets defeated the Cardinals, 207.5-92.5, and fell to the Golden Grizzlies, 165.5-134.5.

Date Published: November 16, 2017

Don’t Be Afraid Of 529s

A lot of people are nervous, or even scared, at the thought of investing their money, especially in a 529 plan. But with a little knowledge and planning, there’s nothing scary about planning for your child’s future. Let’s conquer some of those fears of what you can and can’t do with a 529 plan.

Date Published: November 15, 2017

Rockets fall to Ohio, 38-10

Senior quarterback Logan Woodside threw for 263 yards, but Toledo could not stop Ohio's running attack in a 38-10 defeat at Peden Stadium in Athens last Wednesday night.

Date Published: November 15, 2017

Researcher says commercial real estate investors indeed often act on emotion

A new research piece authored by Matthew Richardson for Fidelity International reveals how commercial real estate investors, despite their best efforts to be rational, exhibit herd-like behavior and emotional reactions that cause the bubbles and crashes the sector experiences on a fairly regular basis.

Date Published: November 14, 2017

Statute requiring disclosure of HIV positive status to sexual partners is constitutional

The Supreme Court recently unanimously upheld the constitutionality of R.C. 2903.11(B)(1), Ohio’s HIV-disclosure statute, which makes it a crime for a person who has tested positive for HIV to knowingly engage in sexual conduct with another without disclosing that information, concluding that it does not violate either the free speech provision of the First Amendment or the Equal Protection Clauses of the United States or Ohio Constitutions.